___________________________
via the Ampersand
The problem I have with this idea is that the book works so well because it is vastly open to interpretation. **SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT**
There's a bunch of people who take it is a religious allegory about the importance of faith, a bunch who take it is proof of the non-existence of god, and then there are those who take it is as a simple adventure story. This works because of the medium in which the story is told. Could it translate into a movie? Maybe. But you would have to do a damn good job of keeping your own interpretation out of the screenplay. It would also be problematic if any hint of the book's "twist" (for lack of a better word) were hinted at at any point prior to the final act.
The fact is, Life of Pi is a really good book. And movies that are based on good books, especially ones that are good precisely because of how well they use the written medium, are rarely good movies.
The problem I have with this idea is that the book works so well because it is vastly open to interpretation. **SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT**
There's a bunch of people who take it is a religious allegory about the importance of faith, a bunch who take it is proof of the non-existence of god, and then there are those who take it is as a simple adventure story. This works because of the medium in which the story is told. Could it translate into a movie? Maybe. But you would have to do a damn good job of keeping your own interpretation out of the screenplay. It would also be problematic if any hint of the book's "twist" (for lack of a better word) were hinted at at any point prior to the final act.
The fact is, Life of Pi is a really good book. And movies that are based on good books, especially ones that are good precisely because of how well they use the written medium, are rarely good movies.
Labels: Life of Pie, literature, movies, Yann Martel
0 Comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)